4 responses to “Hepatitis C virus: cascade of care in infants and children”

  1. Data would be available from BCCDC on the propotion who are actually not followed up. In the absence of this information, this article is potentially misleading and inappropriate. It may well be valid, but the arguement “just because we think so many children are lost to follow up” is not evidenced based medicine.

  2. I will consider changing my practice, but need more information/time

  3. Great article! Our current data here in Alberta shows that only ~30% of perinatally HCV-exposed infants are being followed up and of those who are, about half are being tested for HCV antibodies before 18 months (with many of those testing antibody positive being LTFU afterwards, so their status remains unknown). Efficient post-partum linkage to care programs and effective health information transfer to pediatricians/primary care providers will be crucial to ensure follow-up in infants, especially if testing is deferred until 12-18 months.

  4. Response to Paul Hassleback:

    Thank you for your comment. Unfortunately at this time, in BC we (BCCDC / BC Children’s and Women’s Hospitals / Perinatal Services BC) do not have the linked maternal and infant data to determine what proportion of infants born to mothers with hepatitis C are not followed up – we are actually working on just such a study as it is an important question.

    In the meantime, there are a large number of studies from other jurisdictions that suggest that follow up rates for infants perinatally exposed to hepatitis C are 25-50%; and our clinical experience in BC suggests that the proportion is similar (if not worse) in BC. The gaps in testing have led to a change in public health guidelines in the United States, moving to universal testing of all exposed infants at 2-6 months (see US CDC recommendations); current Canadian guidelines continue to preferentially recommend serology at 18 months with PCR used at 2-6 months for those where loss to follow up is anticipated (see BCCDC Guidelines, and the Canadian Pediatric Society Guidelines)

    While the This Changed My Practice review did not include the exhaustive evidence list, we did in fact do an exhaustive review in preparing this article; a sampling of studies of rates of follow up include:

    1. In Australia, Reid and colleagues found that 10% of their cohort had appropriate follow up (Reid S, Day CA, Bowen DG, et al. Vertical transmission of hepatitis C: Testing and health-care engagement. J Paediatrics and Child Health. 2018;54(6):647-652. doi:10.1111/jpc.13832).
    2. In New Brunswick, Gander and colleagues identified that approximately 25% of their cohort had appropriate testing done (Gander S, Morris A, Materniak S. An Evaluation of Hepatitis C Screening in Infants and Children Born to Seropositive Mothers in Saint John, New Brunswick. Cureus. 2021;13(8):e17377. Published 2021 Aug 23. doi:10.7759/cureus.17377 – View)
    3. In Tennessee, Lopata and colleagues found that 25% had been tested (Lopata SM, McNeer E, Dudley JA, et al. Hepatitis C Testing Among Perinatally Exposed Infants. Pediatrics. 2020;145(3):e20192482. doi:10.1542/peds.2019-2482 – View)

Leave a Reply