19 responses to “Interpretation of Syphilis Serology”

  1. Succinct summary. Useful.

  2. Great simplification if testing. Thanks, also a great reminder as to whom we should consider testing.

  3. Hi – thank you so much for this very helpful summary. Just a note – the treatment for syphilis is IM penicillin G benzathine (2.4 million units) LONG ACTING, divided into 2 doses (1.2 million units each) and injected into the R and L ventrogluteal sites. This formulation can be ordered directly from the BCCDC in pre-filled syringes, divided into the 2 doses. We’ve seen multiple cases of patients treated with a single injection and/or with the short acting formulation, resulting in inadequate treatment.

    For reference: http://www.bccdc.ca/resource-gallery/Documents/Communicable-Disease-Manual/Chapter%205%20-%20STI/CPS_BC_STI_Treatment_Guidelines_20112014.pdf

  4. Excellent summary.
    I was going to comment on the importance of specifying the divided dose of long acting, injected into both ventrogluteal sites (sometimes at the same time, if there is a second clinician available – as this can be more comfortable for the patient). But Chelsea has done a far better job of it.
    I recommend that the authors be asked to edit to include this important detail in their TCMP write up, as not everyone reads these comments.

  5. Thank you for your comments! We made two changes:

    All stages of early syphilis are treated with a single dose of IM penicillin G benzathine (2.4 million units)3.
    All stages of early syphilis are treated with IM penicillin G benzathine (2.4 million units)3, long-acting formulation, divided into two doses of 1.2 million units each, administered in the right and left ventrogluteal sites.

    Late latent disease, or cardiovascular/gummatous disease without neurosyphilis, are treated with three weekly doses of IM penicillin G benzathine (2.4 million units)3.
    Late latent disease, or cardiovascular/gummatous disease without neurosyphilis, are treated with three weekly doses of IM penicillin G benzathine (2.4 million units)3, long-acting formulation, each divided into two doses of 1.2 million units each, administered in the right and left ventrogluteal sites.

  6. Thanks for this succinct and clear summary, extremely helpful. I’m wondering if you can comment on what a significant RPR titre rise might be in someone with previous infection that might alert you to re-infection. For instance, If someone’s titre is reduced to 1:2 after treatment and the it increases to 1:4 on a subsequent test, is that indicative of re-infection or would you see a larger increase? Granted I’m sure you need to factor in risk factors and symptoms, but I often see minor variation in RPR over time in those previously infected/treated and am unsure about interpretation.

  7. Hello Nicholas,
    Thanks for your question. An RPR rise of fourfold or greater (i.e. a change of two doubling dilutions, for example from 1:4 to 1:16, or 1:8 to 1:32) is considered clinically significant and would be consistent with reinfection. A minority of individuals will remain “serofast” despite appropriate treatment, meaning they will continue to have detectable low-level RPR antibodies. Most commonly, these are low-level (less than 1:8), and may demonstrate minor variation (a single dilution) over time. In the absence of an exposure, those in a serofast state with only a twofold change in titre would not be considered reinfected and would not require re-treatment. They should continue to be monitored over time.

  8. Do you have an article or other document that provides a timeline or day by day progression of syphilis serologies converting from nonreactive to reactive…i.e.: how many days does it take for each to convert after infection….?

  9. Patient has a history of RPR two-fold increases which 3 months later dropped again without treatment. Now patient has four fold from 1:2 to 1:8. Since it’s still “low-level” would this indicate reinfection or could be another rise which will later drop?

  10. Every single syphilis case needs to be given Penicillin in to the vein. This is the only way to cure all forms of syphilis. The only way.

  11. this might be a dumb question but if the patients number don’t rise but don’t decrease, staying exactly the same for example 1:20 to 1:20 every time he is tested, does that mean the number will never decrease? Will he ever have a negative result?

  12. Can I ask if there is a correlation between the RPR titer and the TPHA titer? Thanks

  13. To Huong Bui – The RPR titer is a measure of inflammation in the cells, which in this case is related to a syphilis infection. We can see a reactive RPR, sometimes even as high at 1:256, due to other inflammatory processes that have nothing to do with syphilis, as their confirmatory test (whichever ones are used) is nonreactive. The TPPA “titer” is only a measure of the strength of the body’s reaction to the presence of the syphilis organism itself, and once it’s reactive, it is of no further utility in a therapeutic sense…as it most often remains reactive for the life of the patient. The RPR will decrease on its own over time, even without the patient being treated, as the inflammation decreases with the natural quiescence or waning of the active disease process.

  14. Are treponemal tests MORE or LESS likely to be reactive for life in untreated individuals? So if someone was worried about exposure say ten years ago and had symptoms, but their EIA, TPPA, CIA, FTA are all negative, is that conclusive? Or could there be false negatives due to length of time, other factors, ect

  15. The treponemal tests are usually reactive for life whether the person was treated or not…like having a “scar” on the blood…the scar can fade over time, but usually endures. We have seen cases where the TPPA has become weakly reactive after a period of multiple decades since initial testing. In your case, if the confirmatory testing (with multiple types of test methods) is all negative and the possible exposure was ten years ago, I would be suspicious of the reported symptoms from back then, and be confident in the current nonreactive/negative results.

  16. Scott, in that case because of the previous symptoms, would you treat? Or, would you say there’s no possible way for this many false negatives on these tests only ten years later.

    Also, have you seen alcohol or antibiotics effect these tests? I know RPR/VDRL can be, but can treponemal?

  17. Hello Dee – I would say that it is so incredibly unlikely that the patient actually had syphilis those many years ago because they have had numerous nonreactive Treponemal antibody tests since then…not just one nonreactive EIA or whatever, but from your earlier note, nonreactive EIA, CIA, TPPA, and FTA (we know the FTA is very sensitive and is prone to being a false positive). All of those specific antibody tests are nonreactive, so the patient very likely did not have syphilis symptoms…and treatment, I would not recommend it, no. Your lab testing repeatedly indicates the absence of syphilis.

    If the patient is pressing for treatment, you might consider it. We have had some clinicians who will administer one dose of the Bicillin for a patient’s “peace of mind,” but certainly not three weeks of the injections; that’s a lot of PCN to dump into a body needlessly, time for everyone involved, and $ for the medication.

    Regarding alcohol and antibiotics effecting the RPR/VDRL…it’s not likely, but a vaccination could…and also it would be very unlikely that alcohol and/or antibiotics could effect the Treponemal tests.

  18. Actually to anyone here- if a patient said they had exact symptoms, years ago and didn’t realize, but had negative tests, would you treat empirically? Or would you believe it had to be a diff dx since it is the great imitator. Even if they tested so many years later.

  19. It’s just all very confusing. they’re worried they tested too late and it’s not showing. I read some articles on pubmed about false negatives in late and tertiary but usually around rpr/vdrl but a few did pop up on trep specific tests. Maybe we should do the peace of mind shot or a course of doxy for peace of mind in case it was some other bacterial infection that wasn’t properly treated. They were also tested with ANA and RA and those came back negative as well as did Lyme. This is their first time testing for STDs since the encounter. As they thought they were at every routine checkup but weren’t. Ten years is a long time. Like you said at least one of these trep tests would have to show something

Leave a Reply